The Curious Case of Miss Schwich: A Victorian Girl in Boy’s Clothing

Illustrated Police News, 30 October 1886.
(© British Library Board)

In October of 1886, at the Marlborough Street Police Court in London, a young woman dressed in boy’s clothing was charged with stealing from her employer. Her name was Lois Schwich (sometimes spelled Schwick). She was twenty-one years old and had been wearing male attire since the age of seventeen. According to a 29 October 1886 report in the Herts & Cambs Reporter & Royston Crow:

“[Miss Schwich] had made every effort to obtain employment as a girl but had failed, and in desperation to support her starving mother, who had a young family, she assumed the garb of a boy, and succeeded in obtaining a situation.”

In the guise of a boy, Miss Schwich first applied for a position as an errand boy at Messrs. Goodman and Davis, a tailors in Oxford Street. The 21 October 1886 edition of the Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer reports that Miss Schwich told Mr. Goodman “she had never been in a situation before and that she was fifteen years of age.” Believing her to be a boy, Mr. Goodman hired her.

Miss Schwich was employed at Goodman and Davis for several months. During the course of her employment, many articles of clothing—valued between £60 and £80—went missing. Among these items were pairs of trousers and cloth which had been cut to make garments. Though Mr. Goodman didn’t initially report the theft to the authorities, he nevertheless dismissed Miss Schwich from his service.

Wool Walking Dress, 1886.
(Freja Magazine)

Miss Schwich next found employment as a male porter at the shop of Frederick Noble Jones, a glover in Burlington Arcade. Again, she was employed for several months, and again, her employer noticed that some of his goods—a total of £15 worth of boots, gloves, and handkerchiefs—began to disappear. Mr. Noble promptly turned Miss Schwich over to the police. She was ultimately arrested and, as the Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer relates:

“When her sex was discovered the magistrate thought it better that she should not be dressed as a woman until he had disposed of the case.”

The case of Miss Schwich garnered a significant amount of attention—and sympathy. Many people donated money to help her and her “starving” family. The 20 November 1886 edition of the Weekly Irish Times claims that “a clergyman of position” offered to marry her. And the Herts & Cambs Reporter & Royston Crow reports that an officer of the Royal Artillery “had such a strong belief” in Miss Schwich’s innocence that he was willing to stand surety for her appearance in court “even to the extent of £1000.”

Addressing the public fascination with Miss Schwich’s plight, an article in the Weekly Irish Times explains:

“We were desperately moved by the story of the handsome, well-educated maiden of 20, who in order to get bread for her starving mother, donned male attire, and thus disguised obtained a situation, wherein still driven by the same filial impulse, she collared certain coins and other articles, and was handed over to the law. How our sympathies went forth to this heroine, this lovely and devoted victim of a pitiless, social law…”

Aberdeen Evening Express, 14 October 1886..
(© British Library Board)

Unfortunately, a steady accumulation of evidence soon snuffed out the more romantic aspects of Miss Schwich’s tale. When searching the rooms she shared with her family, police found a large quantity of pawn tickets. These proved to be tickets for items that were stolen from her employers, including silk stockings and other items which were later identified in court. According to the Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer, the pawnbrokers testified that the articles in question had “in every instance” been pledged by a woman—presumably Miss Schwich in women’s clothing.

Further investigation, revealed evidence that Miss Schwich may have been using her male disguise to engage in theft for far longer than was originally thought. The 20 November 1886 edition of the Alcester Chronicle reports:

“The girl Lois Schwich, who assumed the habiliments of a lad and obtained a situation as an errand boy, turns out to be an offender known to the police…it is now stated that reasons exist for believing that ‘for years she had been pilfering,’ and that ‘the assumption of boy’s clothing was an old device.’”

Adding to that, a local vicar who claimed to know Miss Schwich’s family wrote to the press, revealing that Miss Schwich’s motivations for dressing as a boy were not as noble as she’d originally claimed. As the 16 October 1886 edition of the Globe states:

“The Rev. B. H. Alford writes from St. Luke’s Vicarage…It has also now come out that the girl in question has passed as ‘a nephew’ for four years or more. So it was no sudden freak of distress which led to concealment of sex; and as we have twice found employment recently for the sister Mary, the plea of disability of sex is scarcely valid.”

Menswear, 1882.
(Met Museum)

Even more damning—at least in the public view—was how Miss Schwich had comported herself outside of the workplace. While dressed in male clothing, Miss Schwich not only smoked cigarettes, but also went out drinking with her male friends. As a result of these revelations, the tide of public opinion turned swiftly against Miss Schwich, prompting the Weekly Irish Times to declare that:

“The romance of Lois Schwich came to an ignoble end on Saturday…Lois turns out a bad lot. Another illusion being blighted, we hold Lois responsible and nothing is now harsh enough to hurl at her.”

In the end, Lois Schwich was convicted of stealing £60 worth of goods from her employers. She was sentenced to eight months’ hard labour. Whether or not she resumed wearing men’s clothing after her release is unknown (at least, to this researcher), but I can’t help but wonder. Was her choice of attire truly only a means to gain employment or to commit a crime? Or did her decision to wear male clothing have more to do with her personal identity? As always, I’ll let you be the judge.

Mimi Matthews is the USA Today bestselling author of The Matrimonial Advertisement, The Pug Who Bit Napoleon, and A Victorian Lady’s Guide to Fashion and Beauty. She researches and writes on all aspects of nineteenth century history—from animals, art, and etiquette to fashion, beauty, feminism, and law.

Sources

Aberdeen Evening Express (Aberdeenshire, Scotland), 14 October 1886.

Dundee Courier (Angus, Scotland), 2 February 1888.

Exeter and Plymouth Gazette (Devon, England), 21 October 1886.

The Globe (London, England), 16 October, 1886.

Herts & Cambs Reporter & Royston Crow (Hertfordshire, England), 29 October 1886.

Hindmarch-Watson, Katie A. “Lois Schwich, the Female Errand Boy: Narratives of Cross-Dressing in Late-Victorian London.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Vol. 14. 2008.

Illustrated Police News (London, England), 30 October 1886.

Morning Post (London, England), 13 November 1886.

“The Romance of Lois Schwich.” Weekly Irish Times (Dublin, Republic of Ireland), 20 November 1886.

“Town Talk.” Alcester Chronicle (Warwickshire, England), 20 November 1886.

Western Times (Devon, England) 20 March 1889.

Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer (West Yorkshire, England), 21 October 1886.

COMING SOON
One of BookBub’s “25 of the Best Books Arriving in 2021”

John Eyre
A Tale of Darkness and Shadow

From USA Today bestselling author Mimi Matthews comes a supernatural Victorian gothic retelling of Charlotte Brontë’s timeless classic.

Yorkshire, 1843. When disgraced former schoolmaster John Eyre arrives at Thornfield Hall to take up a position as tutor to two peculiar young boys, he enters a world unlike any he’s ever known. Darkness abounds, punctuated by odd bumps in the night, strange creatures on the moor, and a sinister silver mist that never seems to dissipate. And at the center of it all, John’s new employer–a widow as alluring as she is mysterious.

Sixteen months earlier, heiress Bertha Mason embarked on the journey of a lifetime. Marriage wasn’t on her itinerary, but on meeting the enigmatic Edward Rochester, she’s powerless to resist his preternatural charm. In letters and journal entries, she records the story of their rapidly-disintegrating life together, and of her gradual realization that Mr. Rochester isn’t quite the man he appears to be. In fact, he may not be a man at all.

From a cliff-top fortress on the Black Sea coast to an isolated estate in rural England, John and Bertha contend with secrets, danger, and the eternal struggle between light and darkness. Can they help each other vanquish the demons of the past? Or are some evils simply too powerful to conquer?

Find out more or Read an Excerpt

Pre-Order Today

ebook: $3.99 $4,99

Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Kobo | Apple

Advance Praise for John Eyre

“In this thrilling remix of Charlotte Brontë’s work, Matthews skillfully transforms a well-known story into a truly original tale.” -Kirkus Reviews

“[Matthews] retells Charlotte Bronte’s classic story in a way that will keep fans of the original novel totally gripped from cover to cover… Fresh and dynamic… Fast-paced and spellbinding…a book you will have a hard time putting down.” -Readers Favorite

“One of the most moving, suspenseful, innovative and remarkable retellings of a classic in the history of, well, ever… Every page is sheer rapture as [Matthews] moulds popular source material into a spell-binding creation so wholly her own.” -Rachel McMillan, bestselling author of The London Restoration


© 2015-2021 Mimi Matthews

For exclusive information on upcoming book releases, giveaways, and other special treats, subscribe to Mimi’s newsletter THE PENNY NOT SO DREADFUL.

You can also connect with Mimi on Facebook and Twitter.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
Privacy Policy Consent
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sarah Waldock
Sarah Waldock
3 years ago

I confess if I had to wear the attractive, but very uncomfortable female garments of the 1880s, I think I’d be tempted to become a man too….

Candy
Candy
3 years ago

A great story! Wearing men’s clothing opened doors for women—even doors into criminal worlds.

Ben
Ben
3 years ago

Given the questions about personal identity you raise at the end, I do have to wonder about your choice to use feminine-coded pronouns and honourifics for Schwich in the post. Contemporaneous sources of course used she/miss/etc. but with current thinking about gender and the ambiguities and unknowns of the situation, this seems like case that’s tailor made for the singular they.

Our website uses cookies which may collect information about your visit to improve our website (anonymous analytics), to show you media (video and audio), targeted advertising, and social media feeds. Please see our Cookie Policy page for further details or agree by clicking the 'Accept' button.

Cookie settings

Below you can choose which kind of cookies you allow on this website. Click on the "Save cookie settings" button to apply your choice.

FunctionalOur website uses functional cookies. These cookies are necessary to let our website work.

AnalyticalOur website uses analytical cookies to make it possible to analyze our website and optimize for the purpose of a.o. the usability.

Social mediaOur website places social media cookies to show you 3rd party content like YouTube and FaceBook. These cookies may track your personal data.

AdvertisingOur website places advertising cookies to show you 3rd party advertisements based on your interests. These cookies may track your personal data.

OtherOur website places 3rd party cookies from other 3rd party services which aren't Analytical, Social media or Advertising.