Long before the twentieth century invention of aerosol hairspray, Victorian women were using sticky hair products to fix their wayward locks stiffly into place. Of these, the most popular was a clear gum solution known as bandoline. Liquid bandoline could be purchased at most Victorian perfumers. It could also be made at home from ingredients like quince-seed, rose-water, cologne, and spirits such as rum or brandy. As the 1859 edition of Godey’s Lady’s Book explains:
“In some peculiar temperaments there is great difficulty of keeping the hair in its place on account of its fineness. This is especially provoking when, in the ball-room or dance, the hair becomes disordered from the least exercise; a mucilage prepared by boiling a few quince-seeds in water, till of a glutinous consistence, will in general remedy this defect.”
Along with wax pomatum, bandoline was part of a group of hair products which were referred to as “fixatures.” In his 1857 book The Art of Perfumery, G. W. Septimus Piesse describes how “the little feathers of hair, with which some ladies are troubled” could be made to “lie down smooth” with the aid of wax pomade. However, though hard wax was useful for smoothing down stray hairs, when it came to setting the entire coiffure into place, nothing could take the place of liquid bandoline.
La Coiffure Francaise, Godey’s Lady’s Book, 1860.
Piesse describes liquid bandoline as being “principally of a gummy nature.” In fact, commercial bandolines were chiefly made using gum tragacanth which was derived from a shrub of the same name. In his 1873 book Instruction and Cautions Respecting the Selections and Use of Perfumes, Arnold James Cooley explains that the resulting “vegetable mucilage” was then “usually combined with a little spirit, to preserve it, and with a little perfume, to render it more agreeable.”
Unfortunately, like other cosmetics of the Victorian era, commercial bandolines and gum solutions were often made with toxic or impure materials which could be harmful to the hair—or even result in it changing color. In his 1900 book The Human Hair, Its Care and Preservation, Joseph R. Stitson states that:
“The prepared bandoline and other gum solutions sold under different names, for the purpose of stiffening the hair and making it hold its shape in a given position, as well as for making it appear thicker, are sometimes injurious, owing to impure materials having been used; cases having been known where the hair has from such causes turned a rusty gray.”
For this reason, it was imperative that ladies purchasing commercial preparations of bandoline first ascertain the ingredients in the product before applying it to their tresses. In most cases, this was sufficient to prevent a hair catastrophe. However, as Stitson goes on to warn his readers, even when made with unobjectionable ingredients, bandoline could still be harmful. He explains:
“As the results obtained by the use of bandoline are due to the fact that the hair is coated, in whole or part, by it with a thin skin of some gum, it follows that the hair is deprived for a time of air and ventilation and is not particularly benefited by such applications.”
Pharmaceutical Record, 1892.
Some ladies opted to make their bandoline at home. As with many cosmetics, this option was often healthier for the hair as it allowed a lady control over the ingredients. When prepared at home, the 1859 edition of Godey’s Lady’s Book reports that:
“Generally bandoline is made by pouring boiling water on quince seeds, allowing the latter to soak in a warm place for a few hours, then squeezing the clear part through muslin, and preserving it.”
To this clear liquid, ladies then added some variety of spice essence to help preserve it. Godey’s advises that “half a drachm of essence of cloves to every half pint of bandoline will answer perfectly.” For ladies who did not care for the odor of cloves, they could instead add “essence of roses, i.e. otto of roses, dissolved in spirits of wine” or “essence of rosemary or of neroli.” Scents like bergamot, lemon, and almond were also quite popular. When combined with bandoline, Cooley reports that the resulting product was then “named accordingly,” i.e. “Rose Bandoline” or “Orange-Flower Bandoline,” etc.
Bandoline could also be colored at will. Many preparations—both homemade and commercial—contained cochineal which gave the bandoline a red cast. The 1860 edition of Godey’s Lady’s Book reports that some bandolines were tinted with “ammoniacal solution of carmine, i.e. Bloom of Roses.”
Coiffure for a Young Lady, Godey’s Lady’s Book, 1863.
Liquid bandoline was applied to the hair either with a sponge or with the fingers, depending on the style preferred. According to Cooley:
“Bandoline is used by ladies, and by hairdressers, to stiffen and fix the hair in curl or place. It is applied either by moistening the fingers and passing the hair through them, or by means of a small piece of sponge.”
For more elaborate rolled or plaited styles, such as those in the 1860s, a sponge application of bandoline over the finished coiffure would help to hold it in place. While, for ringlets, an application with moistened fingers would help to set and style the curls. Most importantly, when using products like bandoline, ladies were advised to thoroughly wash their hair each week in order to remove the inevitable buildup of gummy residue and accumulated grime.
Coiffures, Godey’s Lady’s Book, 1865.
By the mid- to late 1870s, the popularity of gum solutions like bandoline was on the decline. As the 1876 edition of Godey’s Lady’s Book reports:
“Bandoline and cosmetics are rarely used; tonics that strengthen the natural growth and cleanse the scalp are resorted to now in preference.”
Though bandoline might have fallen from favor for a brief period, Victorian women would continue to use fixatures throughout the remainder of the century and well into the next. Whether comprised of rum, brandy, sugar water, or wax, these fixatures would help to keep stray hairs in place until the arrival of aerosol hairspray in the 1940s.
Sources
Cooley, Arnold James. Instructions and Cautions Respecting the Selection and Use of Perfumes with a Comprehensive Collection of Formulae and Directions for Their Preparation. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1873.
Godey’s Lady’s Book. Philadelphia: Louis A. Godey, 1847.
Godey’s Lady’s Book. Philadelphia: Louis A. Godey, 1859.
Godey’s Lady’s Book. Philadelphia: Louis A. Godey, 1860.
Godey’s Lady’s Book. Philadelphia: Louis A. Godey, 1876.
Pharmaceutical Record and Weekly Market Review, Volume XIV. New York: Pharmaceutical Record Company, 1892.
Piesse, G. W. Septimus. The Art of Perfumery. Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston, 1857.
Sherrow, Victoria. Encyclopedia of Hair: A Cultural History. London: Greenwood Press, 2006.
Stitson, Joseph R. The Human Hair, Its Care and Preservation. New York: Maple Publishing, 1900.
COMING SOON
One of BookBub’s “25 of the Best Books Arriving in 2021”
John Eyre
A Tale of Darkness and Shadow
From USA Today bestselling author Mimi Matthews comes a supernatural Victorian gothic retelling of Charlotte Brontë’s timeless classic.
Yorkshire, 1843. When disgraced former schoolmaster John Eyre arrives at Thornfield Hall to take up a position as tutor to two peculiar young boys, he enters a world unlike any he’s ever known. Darkness abounds, punctuated by odd bumps in the night, strange creatures on the moor, and a sinister silver mist that never seems to dissipate. And at the center of it all, John’s new employer–a widow as alluring as she is mysterious.
Sixteen months earlier, heiress Bertha Mason embarked on the journey of a lifetime. Marriage wasn’t on her itinerary, but on meeting the enigmatic Edward Rochester, she’s powerless to resist his preternatural charm. In letters and journal entries, she records the story of their rapidly-disintegrating life together, and of her gradual realization that Mr. Rochester isn’t quite the man he appears to be. In fact, he may not be a man at all.
From a cliff-top fortress on the Black Sea coast to an isolated estate in rural England, John and Bertha contend with secrets, danger, and the eternal struggle between light and darkness. Can they help each other vanquish the demons of the past? Or are some evils simply too powerful to conquer?
Find out more or Read an Excerpt
Pre-Order Today
ebook: $3.99 $4,99
Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Kobo | Apple
Advance Praise for John Eyre
“In this thrilling remix of Charlotte Brontë’s work, Matthews skillfully transforms a well-known story into a truly original tale.” -Kirkus Reviews
“[Matthews] retells Charlotte Bronte’s classic story in a way that will keep fans of the original novel totally gripped from cover to cover… Fresh and dynamic… Fast-paced and spellbinding…a book you will have a hard time putting down.” -Readers Favorite
“One of the most moving, suspenseful, innovative and remarkable retellings of a classic in the history of, well, ever… Every page is sheer rapture as [Matthews] moulds popular source material into a spell-binding creation so wholly her own.” -Rachel McMillan, bestselling author of The London Restoration
© 2015-2021 Mimi Matthews
For exclusive information on upcoming book releases, giveaways, and other special treats, subscribe to Mimi’s newsletter THE PENNY NOT SO DREADFUL.
As with most Victorian matters: fascinating stuff but………..eww¬!
I agree, Carol. I’m not sure I’d enjoy having my hair covered in a gummy substance!
Fascinating. I had no idea that hair control had such a history.
Women were always figuring out ways to get their hair to behave!
Showing that the “build-up of hair products” problem didn’t start with the beehive! Great article.
I’m so glad you enjoyed it, Tracy :)
Great post. Wow! Talk about suffering for fashion! The idea of a kind of glue on one’s hair…yuck. Hair was an amazing barometer of status( and perhaps still is )…. an elaborate dressing meant you either had the time to do it yourself or could pay someone to dress it for you. That’s why the women of the ” lower orders ” thew on a shawl when going out…to hide the hair they didn’t have time to dress.
It does sound sickening, doesn’t it? But then, modern hairspray can often feel like a fine net of glue on one’s hair. Though, at least we have anti-residue shampoos to wash it out at the end of the day. I can’t imagine trying to remove a glue solution from my hair with nothing but toilet soap and a wash basin.
Thank you Mimi, I have never heard of this before. That’s what I love about your site, always something to learn.
I’m so glad you liked it :)
Thanks for this wonderful blog post — it answers a question I’ve had for ages. I can’t imagine some of the outrageous hair styles of the late 1820’s ( http://www.lapl.org/sites/default/files/visual-collections/casey-fashion-plates/rbc1076.jpg ) without some kind of hair lacquer. It’s also obvious that Hollywood hairdressers had some equivalent of hair spray in the nineteen forties, but I never saw an aerosol can of hair spray till the1950s: Aqua Net.
You’re very welcome, Susan :) Hollywood hairdressers relied a lot on setting lotion, I believe. Some varieties had absolutely amazing hold!
IIRC Helene Curtis and Suave were big brands for setting lotions used by leading Hollywood hairdressers
Many thanks for this. Just as with many aspects of Victorian life, one can see why their hair looks lovely but the process taken to achieve that is pretty much a health and safety issue.
You’re very welcome :) I’m glad you enjoyed it!