Overzealous Research Lands Cross-Dressing Victorian Writer in the Dock

Stroll in the Park by Aleksander Gierymski, 1891-1893.

Just before midnight on June 25, 1891, a police detective encountered two women strolling arm-in-arm down Regent Street.  One of the women struck him as being rather odd in appearance.  He approached to investigate, but when he attempted to raise the heavy black veil on the lady’s hat, she firmly knocked his hand away.  It was then that the detective realized that the lady was, in fact, a very elderly gentleman in women’s clothes.  He promptly arrested him.

The elderly gentleman—who stated that his “nom de guerre” was Luke Limner—was taken to Marlborough Street Police Court where he was charged with “being in a public thoroughfare dressed as a woman.”  Initial newspaper reports addressed his behavior with equal parts humor and scorn.  For example, the 27 June 1891 edition of the Aberdeen Evening Express describes him as being “grotesque in appearance.”  While the 29 June 1891 edition of the York Herald labels him “an extraordinary freak of an old gentleman.”

Aged anywhere from 64 to 75 (depending on the report), Mr. Limner presented what many found to be a comical appearance.  He was bald with a bristly, grey moustache and wore a pair of gold-rimmed spectacles perched on his nose.  In every other respect, however, he was dressed as a woman.  As the Aberdeen Evening Express reports:

“He wore a blue serge skirt fringed with red, a black bodice, which by its appearance suggested the presence of a corset and padding beneath, a fashionable light-coloured cape with Medici collar, a matador hat, and a pair of large high-heeled shoes.”

In addition to this somewhat eccentric ensemble, the York Herald reports that Mr. Limner was also wearing a “mass of artificial fringe” attached to his forehead.”  False hair was quite popular during the late nineteenth century and could be bought in large or small pieces and pinned into one’s existing hair.  Given that he was bald, it is not entirely clear how Mr. Limner adhered his false fringe to his forehead.

Advertisement for False Hair, 1898.
Advertisement for False Hair, 1898.

When asked to account for his behavior, Mr. Limner told the court that he was an artist and a writer of “one of the most popular works extant.”  He stated that he had “conceived the idea” of writing a book on women’s fashion.  However, he did not feel that he could accurately write about such things without experiencing them himself.  As he enquired of the court:

“How could I tell whether corsets and high heels really hurt if I did not walk about in them?”

Mr. Limner went on to describe the history and functionality of each of the items he was wearing.  He stated that the hat he wore was “originally worn by men” and that the cape with Medici collar had been “fashionable in the reign of Henry VIII.”  The Aberdeen Evening Express reports that he then lifted up his skirts to reveal “a pair of slim calves covered with dark blue stockings,” and declared to the court that:

“After all, [a skirt] is but a pair of trousers with one leg, and I can assure you, sir, is remarkably airy and nice in this sultry weather.”

At the conclusion of Mr. Limner’s statement, the presiding judge, Mr. Newton, asked the jailor whether or not it was true that Mr. Limner was a known author.  Mr. Limner replied, “Oh, everybody knows me.  I have written for the ‘Graphic.’”  His claim carried little weight with the court.  As the Aberdeen Evening Express reports:

“Mr. Newton remanded the prisoner for a week for inquiries to be made respecting his antecedents, a decision which seemed to astonish the old gentleman, who was led out of the Court apparently very much crestfallen.”

Madre Natura, 1874.

Was the elderly gentleman in women’s clothing really an author doing research?  It appears that he may have been.  Luke Limner was, in fact, the pen name of John Leighton, a Victorian artist and book cover designer who, in 1891, would have been 69-years-old.  In 1847, he wrote a book on women’s fashion titled Madre Natura or the Moloch of Fashion.  In it, he railed against the excesses of women’s fashions and accused the female sex of stuffing their heads with “flounces and furbelows, ribbons and gauze, exhausting their fine imaginations, instead of diverting them into worthy channels.”

In 1874, the fourth edition of Madre Natura was published.  When arrested, the cross-dressing gentleman purporting to be Limner stated that a fifth edition of his most popular book would soon be released.  Was this a fifth edition of Madre Natura?  And, if so, did Leighton/Limner decide that it was about time he dressed up in women’s clothing and discovered for himself whether or not (as he states in his book) high heels really caused “injury to the Achilles tendon” or corsets really did displace the abdominal organs?  This certainly seems possible.  However, as the 27 June 1891 edition of the Globe so reasonably points out:

“It is…not quite clear whether it is absolutely necessary to wear corsets and high heels in Regent-street about midnight in order to be able to pronounce upon their hurtfulness or the reverse.  A less public practising-ground could surely have been chosen.” 

**If you would like to learn more about John Leighton and Madre Natura, the following links may be useful:

The Book Cover Designs of John Leighton (The Victorian Web)

Luke Limner, Madre Natura Versus The Moloch Of Fashion (Courtland Institute of Art)

Mimi Matthews is the author of The Pug Who Bit Napoleon: Animal Tales of the 18th and 19th Centuries (to be released by Pen and Sword Books in November 2017).  She researches and writes on all aspects of nineteenth century history—from animals, art, and etiquette to fashion, beauty, feminism, and law. 

Sources

Aberdeen Evening Express (Aberdeenshire, Scotland), 27 June 1891.

Daily Gazette for Middlesbrough (North Yorkshire, England), 27 June 1891.

Globe (London, England), 27 June 1891.

Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail (Durham, England), 26 June 1891.

Leighton, John.  Madre Natura versus the Moloch of Fashion, a social essay by Luke Limner. 4th Edition. London: Chatto & Windus, 1874.

Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper (London, England), 28 June 1891.

Shields Daily News (Tyne and Wear, England), 26 June 1891.


© 2015-2017 Mimi Matthews

For exclusive information on upcoming book releases, giveaways, and other special treats, subscribe to Mimi’s newsletter THE PENNY NOT SO DREADFUL.

You can also connect with Mimi on Facebook and Twitter.

Leave a Reply

25 Comments on "Overzealous Research Lands Cross-Dressing Victorian Writer in the Dock"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Sarah
Guest

What an interesting post! You’ve piqued my interest now and I’m going to have to look into this further, so thanks for the added links! :)

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I’m glad you enjoyed it, Sarah :)

josephine1837
Guest

Very interesting indeed! I wonder how much personal motivation was behind his ‘research method’. So he got ‘only’ a week in prison for the investigation, and no final judgement or punishment, if I understand it correctly?

At the moment, I’m doing some research on both men and women who crossdressed in the 19th century, and I find their various motivations for their behaviour very interesting. Especially for women, who, dressed as a man, could earn a living or have a carreer.

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I’m glad you liked it, Josephine :) Unfortunately, I don’t know the ultimate outcome of this case. There were no follow-up reports that I could find during my research. I suspect that after being detained in custody for a week, he was probably fined and then let go.

Charlie
Guest

Absolutely typical that he should deride women for being interested in fashion, when that was one of the few creative areas they weren’t utterly shut out from by men, and he himself was fascinated to the extent of writing a book and being arrested for wearing their clothes! Do you think he was being hypocritical, or just trying to cover his own interest?

Mimi Matthews
Guest

If the cross-dressing gentleman was really the author he claimed to be, then I do think he was being hypocritical. Then again, it’s not uncommon for people who privately indulge in a controversial behavior to publicly be the biggest and most vocal opponents of that same behavior. So, in a way, I feel a bit sorry for him!

Sarah Waldock
Guest
Fascinating! I came across a few instances of cross dressing in the Georgian and Regency eras but nothing as detailed as that. They were mostly items mentioned in passing when i was looking up other things, and I only kept one reference. Josephine, are you interested in as early as 1807? I have Rebecca Ann Johnston who was apprenticed to sea by her father in law [stepfather] at the age of 13, and her mother also bound to sea with her, the mother dying at Copenhagen [no mention of whether the mother was forced into male garb as well] and… Read more »
Mimi Matthews
Guest

Glad you enjoyed it, Sarah :) There were quite a few instances of cross-dressing that made their way into the Victorian news. Most men, when arrested, claimed they were dressed as women because a friend had dared them to do it.

Candy Korman
Guest

First thing I read this morning and I started the day with a mini real life mystery!

Thanks for telling this story.

Mimi Matthews
Guest

You’re very welcome, Candy :) I’m glad you enjoyed it!

paper doll
Guest

he railed against the excesses of women’s fashions and accused the female sex of stuffing their heads with “flounces and furbelows, ribbons and gauze, exhausting their fine imaginations, instead of diverting them into worthy channels.”

Mr. Kettle railing about Miss Pot! lol!

Mimi Matthews
Guest

After the comments he made about women in his book, I found his arrest for wearing women’s clothing to be a sort of poetic justice :)

paper doll
Guest

You know he was talking about himself during those comments! lol. Hilarious

Lindsay Downs (@ldowns2966)
Guest

Interesting post. He definitely took his research to a new level. In that day I can see why he would have been brought before the magistrate but not today as no one would give him a second look.

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I’m glad you liked it, Lindsay :) And you’re right, they had much different views about these sorts of things back then.

nottooshabby
Guest

hmmm… the mustache — loved that — and his bald head!

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I can’t imagine how he would have looked with that fringe!

JoHawkTheWriter
Guest

Interesting. I wonder who the woman accompanying him might have been? How did the police detective ascertained that she was indeed a woman? Doing research is a lot of fun, especially when you encounter articles like this one.

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I’m glad you enjoyed it, Jo :) I wondered about the woman accompanying him as well. Unfortunately, there isn’t much information about her, except that when the policeman began to bother the cross-dressing gentleman, she told him “Leave that lady alone!”

JoHawkTheWriter
Guest

LOL. Which, of course, only leads to further speculation.

Matt
Guest

Great story! I’m surprised that there was a specific offence of ‘being in a public thoroughfare dressed as a woman’. It suggests that this must have been quite a widespread ‘problem’.

Mimi Matthews
Guest

I’m glad you enjoyed it, Matt :) I wouldn’t necessarily say it was a widespread problem, however, the Victorians did come down hard on anything they categorized as an “improper act.”

ztevetevans
Guest

Fascinating post, thank you!

Mimi Matthews
Guest

You’re very welcome :)

trackback

[…] Source: Overzealous Research Lands Cross-Dressing Victorian Writer in the Dock – Mimi Matthews […]

wpDiscuz