For many single ladies and gentlemen of the 19th century, placing a matrimonial advertisement in a local newspaper was considered a viable alternative to traditional courtship. It was especially popular with those who were new to an area or those who had no family or social groups through which they might otherwise obtain an introduction to a suitable partner. Naturally, there were those traditionalists who frowned upon this method of acquiring a spouse. It was viewed as undignified, indelicate, and dangerous. Even so, matrimonial advertisements were utilized by men and women of every age and every class throughout the Regency and Victorian eras.
The following matrimonial advertisement was placed in an 1811 issue of London’s Morning Post, where I found it humbly sandwiched between a solicitation for a loan of £50 and an advert for a “Capital Pianoforte.” Notice that the lady advertising does not mention her appearance, her age, or whether or not she is a widow or a spinster.
The next matrimonial advertisement is from an 1822 edition of the Morning Post. This advert is far more specific than the previous, with the gentlemen stating clearly what he wishes for in a wife in terms of age, income, and character.
At the higher end of the social spectrum, an 1823 issue of the Morning Post contains a matrimonial advertisement in which a “nobleman” seeks a “Lady of Fortune.” I do not know who this nobleman was, but it is hard not to imagine him as one of the countless romance novel heroes with an impoverished title who must marry an heiress in order to repair his estates.
The use of a third party to facilitate negotiations between the matrimonial advertiser and his/her applicants was not uncommon. More common still were those who chose to address the advertiser themselves – either in person or by correspondence. In his 1832 book Some Remarks on Matrimonial Advertisements Being an Inquiry into their Use and Abuse, author Y. M. advises on how to proceed when personally answering a matrimonial advertisement, writing:
“[After] all matters, as to connexions [sic] and financial concerns, [are] satisfactorily explained in a preliminary correspondence, an interview, with a desire to ascertain how far the parties are mutually agreeable, is then arranged; and this, (in accordance with regal custom), is greatly facilitated by a previous interchange of miniatures, where practicable.”
After this initial interview and exchange of miniatures, Y. M. presumes that the gentleman – if interested – will have proposed. It is then up to the lady to determine what happens next. As Y. M. states:
“…a reasonable time is then allowed for the lady to make up her mind, and take the sense of her friends and advisers, and usually within a month a definitive answer is received. If unfavourable, it simply declines the overtures, no particular reasons being assigned, that the feelings of neither party may be wounded; of course the correspondence is mutually delivered up, the negotiation ends, and ever after remains an inviolable secret.”
This scheme of correspondence followed by a single interview is one which Y. M. endorses as being thoroughly safe, insisting that “no virtuous woman was ever endangered by an intimacy of this sort.” Unfortunately, matrimonial advertisements were not always safe. Sometimes the advertisers or the applicants were fraudsters, thieves, or even murderers. The most notorious case of this sort took place in 1827. It began with the following matrimonial advertisement placed in the November 13th Morning Herald by a man named William Corder:
“MATRIMONY.— A Private Gentleman, aged 24, entirely independent, whose disposition is not to be exceeded, has lately lost the chief of his family by the hand of Providence, which has occasioned discord among the remainder, under circumstances most disagreeable to relate. To any female of respectability, who would study for domestic comfort, and willing to confide her future happiness in one every way qualified to render the marriage state desirable, as the advertiser is in affluence; the lady must have the power of some property, which may remain in her own possession. Many very happy marriages have taken place through means similar to this now resorted to, and it is hoped no one will answer this through impertinent curiosity, but should this meet the eye of any agreeable lady, who feels desirous of meeting with a sociable, tender, kind, and sympathising companion, they will find this advertisement worthy of notice. Honour and secrecy may be relied on. As some little security against all applications, it is requested that letters may be addressed, (post Paid) to A. Z. care of Mr. Foster, Stationer, No. 68, Leadenhall Street, which will meet with the most respectful attention.”
This advertisement received more than forty letters in response, one of which was from a woman named Mary Moore. She and William Corder were married a week later. A short time after, Mary discovered that, before placing his matrimonial advertisement, her new husband had brutally murdered his last lover and buried her body in a barn. Corder was tried, convicted, and ultimately executed for his crimes. In subsequent years, this sensational case, known as the Red Barn Murder, was used by many as an example of the terrible fiends one might find at the other end of a matrimonial advertisement.
But despite incidences of misrepresentation and outright villainy, matrimonial advertisements only gained in popularity as the century progressed. Advancing into the Victorian era, matrimonial specialty magazines emerged. With titles like the Matrimonial News and the Matrimonial Intelligencer (to name a few), these publications were wholly dedicated to the subject of marriage. This did not mean that newspaper advertisements had fallen by the wayside. In fact, matrimonial advertisements were still printed in abundance in most newspapers of the day, including those newspapers geared toward a particular religious audience. An example of this can be seen in the below advertisement from an 1854 edition of the Catholic Telegraph:
Religion was an important consideration in many matrimonial advertisements. In the following advertisement from an 1892 edition of the Kent and Sussex Courier, a “good looking bachelor” seeks a Christian widow or spinster.
In a similar matrimonial advertisement from the 1894 edition of the Derbyshire Courier, an “affectionate” spinster seeks a “high principled Christian gentleman” with a “sympathetic nature.” I found this advertisement somewhat poignant – perhaps because the lady mentions her loneliness.
Not only were matrimonial advertisements a way for isolated individuals to connect with potential mates, they were an economical alternative to the balls, parties, and expensive entertainments that one must usually attend when seeking a spouse. Of course, the traditional way of finding a husband or wife was in no danger of being supplanted anytime soon, but it’s nice to know that those in the 19th century who lacked family, friends, and great fortune, still had a means of making meaningful connections.
*Author’s Note: My next book The Matrimonial Advertisement will be out in September 2018. Set in 1859, it features a battle-scarred ex-army captain who places an advertisement for a wife. The mysterious lady who arrives on his doorstep isn’t quite what he was expecting. You can read an excerpt from the first chapter HERE.
Sources
“Matrimony.” Catholic Telegraph. June 10, 1854.
“Matrimony.” Derbyshire Courier. November 13, 1894.
“Matrimony.” Kent and Sussex Courier. November 11, 1892.
“Matrimony.” Morning Post. December 19, 1822.
“Matrimony.” Morning Post. June 25, 1823.
“Matrimony.” Morning Post. November 27, 1811.
Phegley, Jennifer. Courtship and Marriage in Victorian England. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2012.
On Sale Now
The Matrimonial Advertisement
England, 1860. When ex-army captain Justin Thornhill places an advertisement for a wife, the mysterious lady who answers isn’t quite what he was expecting. Find out more or Read an excerpt
Order Today
Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Kobo | iBooks
Praise for The Matrimonial Advertisement
“For this impressive Victorian romance, Matthews (The Viscount and the Vicar’s Daughter) crafts a tale that sparkles with chemistry…an excellent series launch that will appeal to fans of Loretta Chase and Stephanie Laurens.” -Publishers Weekly
“Matthews’ (The Pug Who Bit Napoleon, 2018, etc.) series opener is a guilty pleasure, brimming with beautiful people, damsels in distress, and an abundance of testosterone…It’s a well-written and engaging story that’s more than just a romance.” -Kirkus Reviews
“Matthews’ (The Viscount and the Vicar’s Daughter) has a knack for creating slow-building chemistry and an intriguing plot with a social history twist..” –Library Journal
“An intriguing plot and a haunting setting leaves the reader immersed in this impressive series launch.” -Barnes & Noble (20 Favorite Indie Books of 2018)
“Ms. Matthews writes with elegance and precision…The author’s research is impeccable…She also makes excellent use of the remote coastal setting, creating a brooding atmosphere reminiscent of the gothic romances of the time with her evocative descriptions….” -All About Romance
“There’s no way this book could be anything but a historical and a mid Victorian one at that…The initial scary, isolated setting is haunting and leaves you ready to jump at what might come around the corner. The tension is palpable .” -Dear Author
“I absolutely loved every minute I spent with The Matrimonial Advertisement. Mimi Matthews is an exceptional story-teller..” -Passages to the Past
“Gothic Victorian story-telling at its best. This is how this genre is supposed to be written!…By far one of the best books I have read–ever!” -Chicks, Rogues and Scandals
© 2015-2019 Mimi Matthews
For exclusive information on upcoming book releases, giveaways, and other special treats, subscribe to Mimi’s newsletter THE PENNY NOT SO DREADFUL.
You can also connect with Mimi on Facebook and Twitter.
Fascinating, as ever Mimi. Interesting that so many adverts required replies to be post-paid, even when the advertiser is (according to the advert itself) a person of means. Sounds a bit penny-pinching to me, but maybe it was just how things were done.
Thanks Joanna :) So glad you enjoyed it. I wondered about the postage, too. Perhaps it was to protect against people who were responding just to make mischief? In William Corder’s advert, for example, he mentions people responding because of “impertinent curiosity.”
I suspect it was to prevent time-wasters…. a fascinating post, as I was considering using this very ploy in a Brandon Scandal novel. I gasped when I saw the name William Corder, because I know the crime well – it’s part of local folklore for me, and I know the ballad about it, and can be induced to sing it if someone buys me half a pint of cider to do so. The extraordinary feature of the case was that Maria’s stepmother, to whom she was close [not all stepmothers are wicked] dreamed that Maria called to her for justice,… Read more »
There is an 1820s print with the ghost in the barn pointing to where she was buried. It’s a fascinating story. I didn’t know there was a song, too. Thanks for sharing, Sarah :)
http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=youtube+murder+of+Maria+Marten&fr=yhs-invalid#id=17&vid=60c9a2e070ceb169cf76597e1901ff86&action=view
this isn’t a bad version and he knows how to play the guitar
Thanks Sarah!
the song does, which I’d forgotten, mentions her ‘suckling at her mother’s breast’ whereas she was her stepmother, but very fond of Maria.
The version I post is very nearly the same as the one I learned by oral tradition by Suffolk’s own John Goodluck, who also sang the ghost story ‘the suffolk miracle’ though he balked at doing all 28 verses. All stem from the original broadsheet of course. I can’t locate it on the EBBA index though I suspect they may be earlier . This is quite an interesting article though http://redbarnmurder.blogspot.co.uk/2007/12/catnachs-broadsheet.html
Thanks, Sarah. I hadn’t even heard of the murder until I started researching this article and then I learned of it via the 1828 book by George Foster publications (which reprinted Corder’s original advert). The story reminds me a little of Theodore Dreiser’s novel An American Tragedy, which was later made into the Liz Taylor movie A Place in the Sun.
Mary Moore should have done reasonably well out of it though, I believe Corder made quite a lot out of selling his story in lurid detail while he waited to be hanged. [Monday was hanging day in Ipswich, I believe the trial was on Thursday but I’m not sure]
Oh, good point. It hadn’t occurred to me that Corder could have made money off all those penny dreadful type publications on the murder.
Inspired by you, I’ve gone past notes and written the first chapter!
Wonderful! Glad the article provided some inspiration :)
Love it! Thanks for posting such an intriguing article. Just may have to include something along these lines in one of my books!
You’re very welcome, Pam :) So glad you liked it!
Match.com Victorian style.
Exactly!
Wow, what a boon to romance authors! Thank you for sharing this early version of Tinder.[g]
One of my favorite romance novellas is “The Best Husband Money Can Buy”, a Christmas story by Mary Jo Putney. It’s based on a real-life incident that sounds made up until you read the news accounts. History is still the best resource for writing great romance, so thanks again.
You’re very welcome, Darlene :) I’ve been mulling over an 1860s story that starts with an advert for a wife and, once I started researching, the results were too interesting to keep to myself. You are so right about history being the best resource for authors!
Great piece, I could read these all day! And I agree, the lonely lady seems the most poignant, I felt like writing to her myself! I heard that the Pope Benedict’s parents met thought an ad in the 1920s, which seems more like a job description! Love the bit about personal fortune and ‘offers’ at the end :D “Middle ranking civil servant, single, Catholic, 43-years-old, immaculate past, from the countryside, is seeking a good Catholic pure girl, who can cook well, and who can do all housework, who is also capable of sewing and a good homemaker in order to… Read more »
I love it :) And you’re right – it does read like a job description. In fact, it sounds as if what he really needed was a housekeeper!
The great advantage of a wife over a housekeeper was that the wife didn’t have to be paid and couldn’t hand in her notice, either, if she found she didn’t like her new life, a few months into the job! Women went along with it, though, which shows the power of culture.
Very true, Joanna. It’s amazing what women went along with back then – and still do, to some extent! Societal/cultural pressure is a very powerful thing.
So true, Joanna. In the 19th century, women were property, pure and simple, and as such could be treated like slaves. On top of that, I can only imagine how many women (especially when they reached the age where they were considered “spinsters” which, in some cases, was something ridiculous, like mid-late 20’s) their families pushed them to marry anybody who could support them and get them off her hands, regardless of what kind of person the man was. We can be thankful that things have changed drastically in the past 100+ years.
Tam
Reblogged this on Love Lines and commented:
Fascinating article by Mimi Matthews on lonely hearts of the 1800s.
Thanks for the reblog, Laura :) I’m glad you enjoyed it!
The Red Barn murder–fascinating! Nothing better than pouring through the post–letters and newspaper clippings–of the times.
I agree, Angelyn :) I could read through 19th century newspapers all day. They’re a treasure trove!
And I have a limit on myself or I’d spend all day reading and saying ‘oh listen to this, this is interesting…’ to the long suffering husband and would never get any work done.
You have more willpower than I do!
I like getting royalties… and you only get royalties if you keep the nose to the grindstone. Venality, m’dear, not willpower.
I have no idea how to reblog, so I’ve posted a link and the first chapter of the next Brandon Scandal book.
http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/regency-and-victorian-matrimonial.html
Oh, thanks so much for the mention, Sarah :)
An old take on today’s Match.com or eHarmony — some things never change. Very interesting article, thank you for sharing
You’re very welcome, Alfred :) And yes, matrimonial adverts were definitely the 19th century equivalent of modern day internet matchmaking sites.
These are quite fascinating. I note how every ad makes a point to mention income (which was very important in marriage, especially for women of the 19th century, since a proper woman was expected to be supported by her husband) and they are also quite honest without trying to pump up or dumb down (like people do on Facebook, Match.com, and elsewhere). Ah, the days when people were really what they seemed…
Tam
For the most part, the 19th century matrimonial adverts seem to be straightforward and businesslike. Ironically, Corder’s advert was one of the longest and most personal!